In truth, I find this troublesome. While, I freely admit,I have never read this book and have no intention of doing so, I can't help but wonder, if the author truely understands what he wrote. Perhaps, I am not truely understanding...but this is the message I am getting from the description "Hey phedophiles, here's a guide teaching you some alternative ways to do the things, you want to do to small children...that will give you satisfaction but, should you ever get caught, it will help give you a lighter sentence". What are we the consumers suppose to think when he is quoted saying the following:
“While it is not my intention to promote or excuse this practice, I would rather see pedosexuals conquer the world than hear of even one more child being killed because another pedosexual-pedophile is driven into a state of pedocidal-psychosis, or a paranoid-panic-attack, due to the constant hate-mongering which can be heard from every corner of the Earth, demonizing every juvephile regardless of the quality or character of their sexual relations with minors.”
So, I ask you....Should there be a line to safe guard against books like this or should freedom of censorhip be absolute? Where does the resposibilty lie and where is the line drawn?